Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс: http://212.1.86.13:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6959
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DCЗначениеЯзык
dc.contributor.authorМамаtоvа, Т.-
dc.contributor.authorChykarenko, I.-
dc.contributor.authorChykarenko, O.-
dc.contributor.authorKravtsova, Т.-
dc.contributor.authorKravtsov, O.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-06T06:34:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-06T06:34:36Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-06-
dc.identifier.citationМамаtоvа Т., Chykarenko I., Chykarenko O., Kravtsova Т., Kravtsov O. Information systems in project management of the public sphere. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 2021. Vol. 21. No.8. рр. 141–148.uk_UA
dc.identifier.issn1738-7906-
dc.identifier.urihttp://212.1.86.13:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6959-
dc.description.abstractProject management is a current trend of management in the public sphere, based on different principles, methods and tools. The tools include information technologies providing control over time, cost, quality and planning process in order to ensure accountability to interested parties. The goal of the research was to examine the impact of the integration of information systems in project management of the public sphere on the quality of public governance and administration using the example of infrastructure projects involving the private sector in developing countries. The methodology of the research is based on the concepts of “digitalera governance” (DEG), “Information governance” and “project governance” to determine the effectiveness of information systems and technologies in the management of infrastructure projects in the public sphere. The data from the countries with Lower middle income (India, Indonesia, Philippines, Ukraine, Vietnam) and Upper middle income (Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Romania, Russian Federation, Thailand, Turkey) for 1996-2020 were used to study the effects of DEG. The results show two main trends in the countries with Lower middle income and Upper middle income. The first trend is the development of digital governance, the concept of “digital-era governance” through information systems and performance measurement of the governance system, forecasting of investment flows of infrastructure projects, measurement of payback and effectiveness parameters for investment management in the public sector, decision support. The second trend is the existence of systemic challenges related to corruption, social and institutional factors through the development of democracy in developing countries and the integration of NPM similar to developed countries. The confidence of interested parties, especially private investors, in public authorities is determined by other factors – the level of return on investment, risks and assignment of responsibility, probability of successful completion of the project. These data still remain limited for a wide range of project participants, including citizens.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherSoong-Sil University Seouluk_UA
dc.subjectinformation systems of the public sectoruk_UA
dc.subjectpublic sector project managementuk_UA
dc.subject“digital-era governance” (DEG)uk_UA
dc.subject“information governance”uk_UA
dc.subject“project governance”uk_UA
dc.titleInformation systems in project management of the public sphereuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Располагается в коллекциях:Кафедра журналістики

Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл Описание РазмерФормат 
20210819.pdf592,79 kBAdobe PDFПросмотреть/Открыть


Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.