Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://biblio.umsf.dp.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/4824
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorPolyakov, Maxim-
dc.contributor.authorBilozubenko, Vladimir-
dc.contributor.authorKorneyev, Maxim-
dc.contributor.authorNebaba, Natalia-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-06T09:31:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-06T09:31:30Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-06-
dc.identifier.citationMaxim Polyakov, Vladimir Bilozubenko, Maxim Korneyev and Natalia Nebaba (2020). Analysis of key university leadership factors based on their international rankings (QS World University Rankings and Times Higher Education). Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 142-152.uk_UA
dc.identifier.issn1727-7051-
dc.identifier.issn1810-5467-
dc.identifier.urihttp://biblio.umsf.dp.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/4824-
dc.description.abstractIn the context of globalization of the educational services market, competition between universities is becoming more intense. This manifests itself, among other things, in the struggle for positions in international university rankings. Given that universities are evaluated according to many criteria in such rankings, it becomes necessary to identify the most significant factors in determining their positions. This study aims to identify the key factors determining the world’s leading universities’ leadership in international university rankings. The numerical values of the criteria for compiling the QS World University Rankings (QS) and Times Higher Education (THE) rankings were an empirical basis for the study. The analysis covered the Top 50 universities (according to the QS ranking) and was conducted based on reports for 2020 and 2021. At first, clustering was carried out (method – k-means); the data set was the combination of numerical values of QS and THE criteria (six and five criteria, respectively). The universities were divided into three clusters in 2020 (23, 19, 8 universities) and 2021 (23, 17, 10 universities). This showed the universities’ leadership relative to each other for each year. At the second stage, classification processing was performed (method – decision trees). As a result, criteria combinations that give an absolute separation of all clusters (2020 – five combinations; 2021 – eight combinations) were identified. The obtained combinations largely determine universities’ affiliation to clusters; their criteria are recognized as key factors of their leadership in the rankings. This study’s results can serve as guidelines for improving universities’ positions in the rankings.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherLLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives”uk_UA
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProblems and Perspectives in Management;2020 №18(4)-
dc.subjectglobalizationuk_UA
dc.subjectuniversitiesuk_UA
dc.subjectcompetitionuk_UA
dc.subjectinternational rankingsuk_UA
dc.subjectclusteringuk_UA
dc.subjectclassificationuk_UA
dc.subjectleadership factorsuk_UA
dc.titleAnalysis of key university leadership factors based on their international rankings (QS World University Rankings and Times Higher Education)uk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Розташовується у зібраннях:Кафедра міжнародних економічних відносин та регіональних студій

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
PPM_2020_04_Polyakov.pdf494,89 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.