Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://biblio.umsf.dp.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/3337
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorCanon, Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorКэнон, Энрике-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-21T14:11:43Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-21T14:11:43Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-21-
dc.identifier.citation1. Casco Natalia Acosta 2014, “Principios de ética Páblica” [Principles of Public Ethics], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics] Dissemination booklet N° 1, Uruguay 2. De Lima Carlos Soares, Pereyra Fernando Gómez, Piera Adolfo Pérez & Casco Natalia Acosta 2014, “Ética y valores en la función páblica” [Ethics and values in the civil service], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics] Training Manual N° 2, Uruguay 3. Diaz Rosario Gómez-Alvarez, Luna Libertad Gonzólez & Recio Luis Angel Hierro 2013, “UNA REVISION DEL ANALISIS ECONOMICO DE LA CORRUPCION” [A revision of the Economic Analysis of Corruption] Economic Theory and Political Economy Department, Universidad de Sevilla [University of Sevilla], Spain 4. Estra'zulas Nicolás Etcheverry 2006, “Un torneo de todos: ética en la persona, la empresa y el Estado” [Everybody’s tournament: Personal, Corporate and State Ethics], Universidad de Montevideo [University of Montevideo], Uruguay 5. Galarza Napoleon Saltos, 1999 ‘Etica y corrupcion. Estudio de Casos’ [Ethics and Corruption], final report of the Project “Ethics and Corruption”, sponsored by the Responsibility/Ant-Corruption in the Americas Program, Artes Graficas Silva, University of Texas, USA 6. “La Linea Case in Guatemala”, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_P%C3% A9rez_Molina#Caso_de_la_L.C3.ADnea 7. Mancebo Juan F. 2014, “Declaraciones Juradas de bienes e ingresos” [Affidavits of assets and incomes], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics] Dissemination booklet N° 4, Uruguay 8. Muñoz Jaime Rodriguez-Arana, 2004 “Etica, Poder y Estado” [Ethics, Power and State], Rap S.A., Argentina 9. Paz Octavio 1990, “La otra voz” [The other voice] Seix Barral, Mexico 10. Pereira Jorge Rodriguez 2014, “Conflicto de intereses entre lo páblico y lo privado” [Conflict of interest between the public and the private sphere], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics] Dissemination booklet N° 3, Uruguay 11. Pereyra Fernando Gómez 2014, “El Derecho a la Información en Uruguay” [The Right to Information in Uruguay], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics] Dissemination booklet N° 5, Uruguay 12. Report of the Commemoration of the International Anti-Corruption Day 2011, “Politicas Páblicas contra la Corrupción en Uruguay” [Public Policies against Corruption in Uruguay], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics], Uruguay 13. Report of the First Meeting of High Authorities for Corruption Control in MERCOSUR 2012, “El control de la Corrupción en el MERCOSUR” [Corruption control in MERCOSUR], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics] Uruguay 14. Revised Arusha Declaration [signed in Arusha, Tanzania, on July 7, 1993 (81st/82nd WCO Council Sessions) and revised in June, 2003 (101st /102nd WCO Council Sessions)], http://www.wcoomd.org/en/about-us/legal-instruments/declarations.aspx 15. Savater Fernando 1991, “Ética para Amador” [Ethics for Amador] Ariel S.A, Spain 16. Toledo Iván 2014, “El Marco Institucional contra la Corrupción” [The institutional Framework against Corruption], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics] Dissemination booklet No 2, Uruguay 17. Toledo Iván, Pereyra Fernando Gómez & Casco Natalia Acosta 2014, “Normativa Anticorrupción en Uruguay” [Anti-corruption regulations in Uruguay], Junta de Transparencia y ética Páblica (JUTEP) [Commission for Transparency and Public Ethics], Uruguay 18. Uruguay National Customs Directorate 2013 Yearbook 19. Uruguay National Customs Directorate 2015 Yearbook 20. Vazquez Malet M. 1998, “La corrupción en la Administración Páblica: aproximación a la Ley N° 17060, normas referidas al uso indebido del poder páblico” [Corruption in the Public Administration: Law No 17060 approach, regulations related to the misuse of public power] Carlos Alvarez, Uruguayuk_UA
dc.identifier.urihttp://biblio.umsf.dp.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/3337-
dc.description.abstractThe relevance of the issue being considered by the author is confirmed by the fact that the governments of many countries are making tremendous efforts and use all available resources (both technical and financial) to ensure the transparency of customs procedures and improve the professional ethics of customs officers in order to reduce the level of corruption and the promote an economic growth.From this point of view the author has made the economic analysis of corruption and highlighted its three basic characteristics: a clear and transparent regulation that has been broken; an official that breaks the law and obtains a benefit; the appreciation that the benefit is a direct consequence of the corrupt act.The author has also analyzed the measures undertaken by the Uruguay National Customs Directorate with the aim of raising the level of professional behavior of employees and increasing the transparency of customs formalities. Among them there are the following: executive management team responsibility; changes in the regulatory framework; automation of customs procedures and improving their transparency; contracting officials followed by an assessment of their activities; implementation of incentive policies to promote a high level of professional ethics and preventive strategies aimed at the detection of corruption and disciplinary measures or prosecution of those employees who are participants in corruption schemes; establishment of codes of professional conduct of Customs officials; implementation of sound human resource management policies; implementation of corporate social responsibility system; promoting open, transparent and productive relationship with the business sector.To more deeply research the chosen subject the following scientific methods were used: analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, induction, deduction.In conclusion, the author emphasizes that it is crucial to work on ethics and transparency at the Customs administrations around the world to combat corruption for the sake of the Customs administrations and society. In author’s opinion, in order to be successful in combating corruption the Uruguay National Customs Administration has to act in a planned and coordinated manner by means of implementing different innovative measures.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherУніверситет митної справи та фінансівuk_UA
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCustoms Scientific Journal;№1,2016-
dc.subjectprofessional ethicsuk_UA
dc.subjectCustoms officialsuk_UA
dc.subjecttransparency of customs proceduresuk_UA
dc.subjectcorruptionuk_UA
dc.subjectthe Uruguay National Customs Directorateuk_UA
dc.subjectпрофессиональная этикаuk_UA
dc.subjectсотрудники таможенных органовuk_UA
dc.subjectпрозрачность таможенных процедурuk_UA
dc.subjectкоррупцияuk_UA
dc.subjectНациональное таможенное управление Уругваяuk_UA
dc.titleEthics and transparency in Customsuk_UA
dc.title.alternativeПрофессиональная этика сотрудников таможенных органов и прозрачность таможенных процедурuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Розташовується у зібраннях:Customs 2016/1

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
Customs 2016 №1-95-106.pdf1,03 MBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити
Customs 2016 №1-208-221.pdf1 MBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.