Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://biblio.umsf.dp.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/2148
Назва: Impact of trade openness in labour intensive full package manufacturing industries and its fragmented value chain: a theoretical study of readymade garments sector of Bangladesh
Інші назви: Влияние открытости торговли на трудоемкую текстильную промышленность полного цикла и фрагментирование добавленной стоимости: теоретический анализ сектора готовой одежды Бангладеш
Автори: Hassan, Tariq
Хассан, Тарик
Ключові слова: trade openness
trade fragmentation
value chain
ready-made garments
full package manufacturing
labour intensive industry
tariff and non-tariff barrier
Bangladesh
development outcome
открытость торговли
сегментированная торговля
цепочки создания добавленной стоимости
готовая одежда
полномасштабная обрабатывающая промышленность
трудоемкое производство
тарифные и нетарифные барьеры
Бангладеш
результаты развития
Дата публікації: 6-кві-2017
Видавництво: Academy of Customs Service of Ukraine
Бібліографічний опис: Ahmed, N 2009, “Sustaining Ready-made Garment Exports from Bangladesh”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 597–618 Anas, T 2012, “Indonesia’s new protectionist trade policies: a blast from the past”, East Asia Forum, viewed 20 April 201, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/06/18/indonesias-new-protectionist-trade-policies-a-blast-from-the-past/ Ando, M; Arendt, S; & Kimura, F 2006, “Production networks in East Asia: strategic behaviour by Japanese and US firms”, Paper presented at Japan Centre for Economic Research conference on ‘Multinational firms’ strategies in East Asia: a comparison of Japanese, US, European and Korean firms’ Athukorala, P 2011, “Production networks and trade patterns in East Asia: regionalisation or globalisation?”, Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 10 No. 1 Baldwin, R 2013, ‘The WTO and global supply chains’ East Asia Forum, viewed 27 May, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/02/24/the-wto-and-global-supply-chains/ Bangladesh Bank 2015, ‘Bangladesh Bank open data initiative’, Bangladesh Bank, viewed 20 April 2015, www.bangladesh-bank.org/econdata/index.php Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics 2012, ‘Gender statistics of Bangladesh’, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, viewed 20 April 2015, http://www.bbs.gov.bd/ WebTestApplication/ userfiles/Image/Health_Demo/Gender_Statistics.pdf Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) 2014, Dhaka, Bangladesh, viewed 28 April 2015, http://www.bgmea.com.bd/home/pages/ TradeInformation Basri, C & Patunru, A 2012, “How to keep trade policy open: the case of Indonesia”, in Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 48, No. 2 Boubakri, N, Cosset, JC & Guedhami, O 2005, “Liberalization, corporate governance and the performance of privatized firms in developing countries”, Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 767–790. Damuri, Y 2013, “International production sharing: insights from exploratory network analyses”, CTEI working papers, viewed 28 May 2015, http://graduateinstitute.ch/ files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/ctei/shared/CTEI/working_papers/CTEI-2012-03.pdf Dowrick, S & Golley, J 2004, “Trade Openness and Growth: Who Benefits?”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 38–56 Edwards, S 1992, “Trade orientation, distortions and growth in developing countries”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 31–57 Fontana, M 2003, “The gender effects of trade liberalisation in developing countries: a review of the literature”, Discussion Paper, No. 101, University of Sussex, Brighton. Frankel, JA & Romer, DH 1999, “Does Trade Cause Growth?”, American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 379–399 Gereffi, G 1999, “International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 37–70 Goulet, D 1973, The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development, Atheneum Gereffi, G & Memedovic, O 2003, “The global apparel value chain: what prospects for upgrading by developing countries”, Sectoral Studies Series, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, viewed 14 April 2015, https://www.unido.org/ fileadmin/user_media/Publications/Pub_free/Global_apparel_value_chain.pdf Hewett, P & Amin, S 2000, “Assessing the impact of garment work on quality of life measures”, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, viewed 13 April 2015, http://www.bids-bd.org/sajeda.htm. Hossain, MA & Alauddin, M 2005, “Trade Liberalization in Bangladesh: The Process and Its Impact on Macro Variables Particularly Export Expansion”, The Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 127–150 Hossain, M & Karunaratne, N 2004, “Trade Liberalisation and Technical Efficiency: Evidence from Bangladesh Manufacturing Industries”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 87–114 Hummels, D; Ishii, J; & Yi, K. M 2001, “The nature and growth of vertical specialisation in world trade”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54 Jones, R, Kierzkowski, H & Lurong, C 2005, “What does evidence tell us about fragmentation and outsourcing?”, International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 305–316. Kabeer, N & Mahmud, S 2004, “Globalization, gender and poverty: Bangladeshi women workers in export and local markets”, Journal of International Development, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 93–109 Kharas, H. & Kohli, H 2011 “What is the middle income trap, why do countries fall into it, and how can it be avoided?”, Journal of Global Emerging Market Economies, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 281–289 Nahar, B & Siriwardana, M 2009, “Impact of Trade Liberalization on Poverty in Bangladesh A Quantitative Assessment”, South Asia Economic Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 325–369 Nordis, HK 2004, “The global textile and clothing industry post the agreement on textiles and clothing”, Discussion Paper, no.5, World Trade Organization, Geneva, viewed 13 May 2015, https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/discussion_papers5_e.pdf OECD, see Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2002 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2002, ‘Foreign directinvestment for development: maximising benefits, minimising costs’, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, viewed 20 April 2015, http://www.oecd.org/investment/investmentfordevelopment/1959815.pdf Pritchett, L 1996, “Measuring outward orientation in LDCs: Can it be done?”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 307–335 Raihan, S 2008, Trade Liberalization and Poverty in Bangladesh, University Library of Munich, Germany, viewed 16 May 2015, https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/37905.html Rodriguez, F, Rodrik, D, Rodriguez, F & Rodrik, D 2000, “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-National Evidence”, in Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Ben Bemanke and, MIT Press for NBER Sachs, JD & Warner, A 1995, “Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 26, no. 1, 25th Anniversary Issue, pp. 1–118 Sen, A 1999, Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press. Solow, RM 1956, “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 65–94 Stensnes, K 2006, “Trade openness and economic growth: do institutions matter?”, Working Paper, no. 702, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Swan, TW 1956, “Economic growth and capital accumulation”, The Economic Record, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 334–361 Thirlwall, AP 2011, Economics of Development: Theory and Evidence, Palgrave Macmillan Wignaraja, G 2013, “Indonesia: faltering growth and a hint of protectionism”, East Asia Forum, viewed 20 May 2015, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/ 2013/02/27/indonesiafaltering-growth-and-a-hint-of-protectionism/ Yi, K 1999, “Can vertical specialization explain the growth in world trade?” in Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 111, No. 1, pp. 52–102
Серія/номер: Customs;№ 2, 2016
Короткий огляд (реферат): This paper adopts a theoretical approach based on certain trade statistics of Bangladesh and existing literature to examine the relationship between trade openness and economic development in the case where fragmented value chain based labour intensive buyer driven manufacturing industry is dominant, taking ready-made garments sector of Bangladesh as an example. Despite there exists no uniform conclusion in the literature that trade openness will always lead to positive development outcome in every context, this paper argues that an open trade economy with comparative advantage in labour supply will always be benefited from the changing nature of global production system that relies more on fragmented value chain. The study finds that in the case of Bangladesh, a shift in policy regime towards an open trade economy from an infant industry protection policy has brought significant positive development outcomes not only for the country’s economy but also for the society as a whole as it flourished the development of buyer driven labour intensive readymade garments industry in Bangladesh. Both the static and dynamic gains from trade openness in the country has been substantial in the form of generating employment and export revenue, increasing investments, reducing poverty, raising competitiveness in the global market, promoting female labour force participation in the economy and in many other ways. As such, this paper advocates that further liberalization of trade policies and integrating in the global production value chain should be the prime policy objective of the government in order to establish Bangladesh as a global production hub in the future.
URI (Уніфікований ідентифікатор ресурсу): http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2148
Розташовується у зібраннях:Customs 2016/2

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
CSJ_2016_02-75-85.pdfЕлектронне видання1,32 MBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити
CSJ_2016_02-179-191.pdfЕлектронне видання1,13 MBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.