Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал:
http://biblio.umsf.dp.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/2107
Назва: | Trade Facilitation, the Authorized Economic Operator and the Single Window: a Gravity Model Approach |
Інші назви: | Упрощение процедур торговли, режим уполномоченного экономического оператора и принцип единого окна: подход с точки зрения гравитационной модели |
Автори: | C.de Sá Porto, Paulo Morini, Cristiano де Са Порто, Пауло Морини, Криштиано |
Ключові слова: | trade facilitation Authorized Economic Operator Single Window Mutual Recognition Arrangement gravity model упрощение процедур торговли режим Уполномоченного экономического оператора программа Единое окно Соглашение о взаимном признании гравитационная модель |
Дата публікації: | 6-кві-2017 |
Видавництво: | Academy of Customs Service of Ukraine |
Бібліографічний опис: | 1.Behar, A; Manners, P; Nelson, B. Exports and International Logistics. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5691, 2011. 2.Bröcker, J. Interregional Trade and Economic Integration: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, n.18, pp.261-281, 1988. 3.Camara de Comércio (CAMEX). Facilitação de Comércio – Principais Medidas. Brasília: Ministério de Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior, 2012. 4.Cheng, I; Wall, H.J. Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade. Working Paper 1999-010B, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 1999. 5.Linnemann, Hans. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1966. 6.Morini, C. A Facilitação Comercial como Ferramenta de Inserção da Indústria Nacional nas Redes de Produção Internacionais. In SÁ PORTO, P. C. (org)., Organização Mundial do Comércio – Temas Contemporâneos. Santos, Brazil: Leopoldianum, p.164, 2013. 7.Macedo, L. C. L.; Scorza, F.A.T. Guichê Único (Single Window) e as negociações da OMC sobre Facilitação do Comércio. In SÁ PORTO, P. C. (org)., Organização Mundial do Comércio – Temas Contemporâneos. Santos, Brazil: Leopoldianum, p.164, 2013. 8.Macedo, L. C. L.; Sa Porto, P. C. Aspectos Legais e Econômicos do Acordo de Facilitação Comercial da OMC. Política Externa (USP), v. 20, p. 161-171, 2011. 9.Pöyhönen, Pentii. A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade Between Countries. Welwirtschaftliches Archiv, v.90 No.1, pp. 93-99, 1963. 10.Sa Porto, P. C., Barral, W., Matos, M. D., Silva, R. C. Facilitação Comercial no Brasil: Avanços e Desafios. Política Externa (USP), v.22, p.61 - 80, 2013a. 11.Sa Porto, P. C., Barral, W., Silva, R. C., Matos, M. D. Facilitação Comercial Hard e Soft: Lições da União Européia para o Brasil. In SÁ PORTO, P. C. (org)., Organização Mundial do Comércio – Temas Contemporâneos. Santos, Brazil: Leopoldianum, p.164, 2013b. 12.Sa Porto, P. C.; Azzoni, C. R. How international integration affects the exports of Brazilian states. Revista de Economía Mundial, v. 17, p. 133-153, 2007. 13.Sa Porto, P. C.; Canuto, O. Uma avaliação dos impactos regionais do MERCOSUL usando dados em painel. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico, v. 34, n. 3, 2004. 14.Sa Porto, P. C.; Canuto, O. Mercosul: Gains from Regional Integration and Exchange Rate Regimes. Economia Aplicada, São Paulo, v. 6, n.4, p. 1, 2002. 15.Sa Porto, P.C. Mercosur and Regional Development in Brazil: A Gravity Model Approach, Estudos Econômicos (FIPE/USP), v. 32 n.1, pp. 125-153, 2002. 16.Scorza, F.A.T. Trade facilitation and Customs procedures in WTO negotiations: outputs for Customs Law in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Comércio Exterior, Rio de Janeiro, Funcex, v. 92, p. 44 – 58, 2007. 17.Tinbergen, Jan. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1962. 18.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Comrade Database. 2014. Available at: <http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ditctab20122_en.pdf>. Access in: 01/30/2014. 19.United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business (UN/CEFACT). Recommendation and Guidelines on Establishing a Single Window. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2005. 20.Wilson, J. S.; Mann, C. L.; Otsuki, T. Assessing the Benefits of Trade Facilitation: A Global Perspective. The World Economy, v.28, n.6, pp.841–871, 2005. 21.Wilson, J. S.; Mann, C. L.; Otsuki, T. Trade Facilitation and Economic Development: A New Approach to Measuring the Impact. World Bank Economic Review, v.17, n.3, pp.367–389, 2003. 22.World Bank. The World Bank Databank. 2014. Available at: <http:// databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx>. Access in: 01/30/2014. 23.World Customs Organization (WCO). AEO Template, 2014 Edition. Brussels, WCO, 2014a. 24.World Customs Organization (WCO). Compendium of Authorized Economic Operator Programmes, 2014 Edition. Brussels, WCO, 2014b. 25.World Customs Organization (WCO). A Survey of Single Window Implementation. Research Paper Nº. 17. Brussels, WCO, August, 2011. 26.World Economic Forum (WEF). The Global Enabling Index Report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. 27.World Trade Organization (WTO). Regional Trade Agreements, 2014. Available at: <http:// http://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicAllRTAList.aspx>. Access in: 01/30/2014. |
Серія/номер: | Customs;№ 2, 2014 |
Короткий огляд (реферат): | This paper was presented at the Inaugural INCU Global Conference “Trade Facilitation Post-Bali: Putting Policy into Practice” 21–23 May 2014 in Baku, Republic of Azerbaijan. The authors analyze the impact of trade facilitation measures on international trade flows. For that purpose a gravity model such as in Wilson, Mann and Otsuki (2005) was used. The authors used a more recent dataset, a panel that included trade data from 2011 and 2012 for 75 countries. In order to measure the impacts of trade facilitation measures, the authors included dummy variables for the presence of an Authorized Economic Operator program, for the existence of a Single Window program in the countries of the sample and for the existence of a Mutual Recognition Arrangement between pairs of countries in analyzed sample. Those three variables were used as a proxy for trade facilitation. The authors discuss the results which show that the presence of an Authorized Economic Operator program and the existence of a Single Window program will improve countries’ trade performance. By contrast, the existence of a Mutual Recognition Arrangement will not necessarily improve the countries’ trade performance. These results suggest that in general trade facilitation measures as a whole will help countries improve their trade performance. |
URI (Уніфікований ідентифікатор ресурсу): | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2107 |
Розташовується у зібраннях: | Customs 2014/2 |
Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл | Опис | Розмір | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSJ_2014_2-45-54.pdf | Електронне видання | 744,84 kB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/Відкрити |
CSJ_2014_2-117-128.pdf | Електронне видання | 947,02 kB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/Відкрити |
Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.